10 条评论

• stingraycharles 12小时前
  Hmmm isn’t a lower Peter count better? From what I understand, OpenClaw is a mess, and it kind of shows from the commits. Pull requests with 1500+ commits, only reviewed by bots, etc.

  Or perhaps this is what the “roast” part of the repo refers to.

  Regardless, he seems to be a quantity over quality person
• chanux 13小时前
  I thought this has something to do with the Peter Principle.
  [-]
  • stingraycharles 12小时前
    Both can be true.
• Haven880 11小时前
  Peter Steinberger is the 100x developer type. So using him as base unit is a very high bar. Majority of programmers I see (before AI) hover maybe 0.5 to 0.1 Peter. MS getting 1.86 is mostly due the measurement is for their public GitHub which is still quite good. If their hidden coding bases measured, it probably would be several thousands of Peter.
• killingtime74 12小时前
  I was wondering who this was. figured out eventually it's the author of Openclaw
• opengrass 13小时前
  Good r&d isn't public
  [-]
  • hiddencost 13小时前
    ... Like the University system, the national labs, NASA, ...

    What are you talking about?

    [-]
    • senectus1 12小时前
      probably looking at apple...
• whoami22222 2天前
  would be nice to know what's microsoft's peter units including all intenral source code as well.
• spwa4 6小时前
  I like weird units no one wants to talk about. For example, I make .0016 Levandowski's.
• dvh 12小时前
  Article does not explain what Peter unit is. Title is misleading.
  [-]
  • stingraycharles 12小时前
    It does, it’s the commit velocity.
• fwipsy 12小时前
  Can we not post clickbait to HN? My fault for clicking, I guess. An informative title would be e.g. "Compare your organization's Github productivity to @steipete."
• cowpig 13小时前
  oh great more memes about that data security catastrophe